Dunlop Tristorm Lite vs Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 wins by 26 points
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 scores 98/100 against 72/100 for the Dunlop Tristorm Lite. Its biggest edge is power (+34). On price, the Dunlop Tristorm Lite is currently €217 cheaper.
“The Tristorm Lite is a forgiving entry-level teardrop that prioritizes ease of swing over raw performance, making it accessible but unremarkable. The EVA core delivers a predictable, muted feel that suits absolute beginners transitioning from tennis or picking up padel for the first time, though the head-heavy balance at 365g creates a slight contradiction with its lite branding, adding fatigue on extended volleys. At its price point Dunlop faces stiff competition from Babolat and Head beginner lines that offer comparable or better sweetspot tolerance, keeping value squarely average.”
“The Hyper Pro 2.0 is Oxdog's mainstream teardrop, and independent aggregate reviews (padel.fyi, 4 experts, 8.5/10) confirm power near 83 - matching our original figure exactly - but score control, maneuverability and sweet spot meaningfully higher than our original pass had them. Corrected here: this is a genuinely well-rounded attack-leaning all-rounder, not the middling card the previous numbers suggested.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool