Enebe Response Alu vs Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 wins by 22 points
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 scores 98/100 against 76/100 for the Enebe Response Alu. Its biggest edge is maneuverability (+27). On price, the Enebe Response Alu is currently €187 cheaper.
“The Response Alu 2025 is the aluminium-liveried mid-tier of Enebe's Response family: an 18K face over EVA scoring power 77 with the standard firm-ish terms (control 68, comfort 67, tolerance 66) and honest handling (69). Weight documentation is incomplete. Value 74 trails the family's 24K star. The buying logic within this brand never changes: the Response 24K carries a denser face and better arithmetic, the Mustang vintages hit harder for less, and the Alu earns its place only via discount. The frame is honest; the family is crowded. Compare before committing.”
“The Hyper Pro 2.0 is Oxdog's mainstream teardrop, and independent aggregate reviews (padel.fyi, 4 experts, 8.5/10) confirm power near 83 - matching our original figure exactly - but score control, maneuverability and sweet spot meaningfully higher than our original pass had them. Corrected here: this is a genuinely well-rounded attack-leaning all-rounder, not the middling card the previous numbers suggested.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool