Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem Lite By Agustin Tapia vs Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem Lite By Agustin Tapia wins by 9 points
Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem Lite By Agustin Tapia scores 96/100 against 87/100 for the Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 Classics. Its biggest edge is comfort (+28). On price, the Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem Lite By Agustin Tapia is currently €77 cheaper.
“The Xtrem Lite is the 2026 AT10 built for players who want Tapia's crispness at a weight that does not tax the shoulder: 365 g, even balance, teardrop head. The 12K carbon face over an EVA core keeps the strike snappy, and maneuverability 76 means the frame is on time at the net where heavier AT10s run late. Power 85 still finishes club-level points; control 79 keeps bandejas composed. Comfort 70 and tolerance 69 are liveable for the class. Value 72 is the only modest number: you pay signature money for the lighter build. A very easy racket to play well.”
“The Classics colourway of the Hyper Pro 2.0 shares the identical platform, and the same independent-aggregate correction applies (padel.fyi, 8.5/10): control, maneuverability and sweet spot were underweighted in our original pass relative to what the confirmed power (83) implied for a genuinely well-rounded teardrop.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool