padelracketreviews
Racket comparison · 2026

Bullpadel Elite W Tour Final 25 Woman vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.

Bullpadel Elite W Tour Final 25 Woman
Bullpadel

Bullpadel Elite W Tour Final 25 Woman

87
Best
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

91
PRR verdict

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red wins by 4 points

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red scores 91/100 against 87/100 for the Bullpadel Elite W Tour Final 25 Woman. Its biggest edge is power (+11). The Bullpadel Elite W Tour Final 25 Woman answers back on sweet spot (+7). On price, the Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red is currently €40 cheaper.

Score breakdown
Bullpadel Elite W Tour Final 25 Woman
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Overall
87/100
91/100Best
Control
83Best
78
Power
79
90Best
Sweet spot
73Best
66
Maneuverability
78Best
72
Comfort
74Best
67
Specs
Bullpadel Elite W Tour Final 25 Woman
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Shape
Round
Round
Balance
Head-light
Even
Weight
360 g
375 g
Core
Multi-EVA
EVA
Face material
Fibreglass
Carbon 12K
Level
Intermediate
Intermediate
Playing style
Power
Power
Bullpadel Elite W Tour Final 25 Woman

The Elite W Tour Final 25 is built around feel: a fibreglass face over multilayer EVA in a head-light 360 g package, and the result is a racket that seems to slow the game down. Control 83 and maneuverability 78 mean you are early to the volley and precise with the lob; comfort 74 and tolerance 73 forgive both long days and imperfect contact. Power 79 is enough to punish a genuinely short ball but this is a constructor's frame, not a finisher's. Value 70 reflects Tour Final pricing. For intermediate players who win with brains and hands, it is a lovely thing.

200at PadelNuestroReview & prices
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160at PadelProShopReview & prices

Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.

Open compare tool
More comparisons
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05