Bullpadel Xplo CMF vs Dunlop 25 Galactica Lite
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Bullpadel Xplo CMF wins by 8 points
Bullpadel Xplo CMF scores 85/100 against 77/100 for the Dunlop 25 Galactica Lite. Its biggest edge is power (+14). The Dunlop 25 Galactica Lite answers back on maneuverability (+8). On price, the Dunlop 25 Galactica Lite is currently €86 cheaper.
“XPLO Comfort keeps the same geometric head and the same Xplo Core as the standard racket, but swaps the stiff X-Tend carbon face for Fibrix and grows the hitting surface to 535cm2 -- noticeably larger than the standard XPLO's 507cm2. The result is a racket that still hits hard (power 88) but forgives far more, making it the sensible entry point into XPLO's explosive identity for advanced players who aren't ready for the full-send version.”
“The Galactica Lite is Dunlop's featherweight: 350 g with a Soft EVA core, scoring maneuverability 76 and comfort 73 as its defining numbers, with power 74 keeping more bite than most frames this light manage. Control 70 and tolerance 72 are fair. Face documentation is incomplete. Value 76 is honest. The recipe suits the usual light-frame constituencies: net-forward players, developing arms, shoulder-managers, and anyone stepping up who fears mass. Dunlop's quiet-competence pattern holds: nothing headlines, everything works, the invoice behaves. A sensible, undramatic answer to the light question.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool