padelracketreviews
Racket comparison · 2026

Dunlop Tristorm Lite vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.

Dunlop Tristorm Lite
Dunlop

Dunlop Tristorm Lite

Best
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

91
PRR verdict

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red wins by 19 points

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red scores 91/100 against 72/100 for the Dunlop Tristorm Lite. Its biggest edge is power (+26). The Dunlop Tristorm Lite answers back on sweet spot (+10). On price, the Dunlop Tristorm Lite is currently €83 cheaper.

Score breakdown
Dunlop Tristorm Lite
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Overall
72/100
91/100Best
Control
72
78Best
Power
64
90Best
Sweet spot
76Best
66
Maneuverability
76Best
72
Comfort
74Best
67
Specs
Dunlop Tristorm Lite
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Shape
Round
Round
Balance
Even
Even
Weight
365 g
375 g
Core
Soft EVA
EVA
Face material
Fibreglass
Carbon 12K
Level
Intermediate
Intermediate
Playing style
Power
Power
Dunlop Tristorm Lite

The Tristorm Lite is a forgiving entry-level teardrop that prioritizes ease of swing over raw performance, making it accessible but unremarkable. The EVA core delivers a predictable, muted feel that suits absolute beginners transitioning from tennis or picking up padel for the first time, though the head-heavy balance at 365g creates a slight contradiction with its lite branding, adding fatigue on extended volleys. At its price point Dunlop faces stiff competition from Babolat and Head beginner lines that offer comparable or better sweetspot tolerance, keeping value squarely average.

77at PadelNuestroReview & prices
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160at PadelProShopReview & prices

Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.

Open compare tool
More comparisons
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05