Enebe Aerox 7.1 V 2 vs Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 wins by 22 points
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 scores 98/100 against 76/100 for the Enebe Aerox 7.1 V 2. Its biggest edge is sweet spot (+27). On price, the Enebe Aerox 7.1 V 2 is currently €167 cheaper.
“The Aerox 7.1 V2 is the Combat's twin with one point more handling: the same HR3 core and 3K face, the same power 78 and firm terms (66/65), maneuverability 69 against the Combat's 68. Weight documentation is incomplete on both. Value 78 matches too. Twins this identical from one brand resolve the usual way: confirm the specimens, buy the cheaper listing, and enjoy the springy HR3 response either way. Enebe's mid-tier remains one of the quieter value stories in the market; the naming overlap is the only genuinely confusing thing about it.”
“The Hyper Pro 2.0 is Oxdog's mainstream teardrop, and independent aggregate reviews (padel.fyi, 4 experts, 8.5/10) confirm power near 83 - matching our original figure exactly - but score control, maneuverability and sweet spot meaningfully higher than our original pass had them. Corrected here: this is a genuinely well-rounded attack-leaning all-rounder, not the middling card the previous numbers suggested.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool