“The Aerox 7.1 V2 is the Combat's twin with one point more handling: the same HR3 core and 3K face, the same power 78 and firm terms (66/65), maneuverability 69 against the Combat's 68.”
Own this racket? Tell us if our scores feel right — enough responses feed the next rescoring pass.
Power
Control
Maneuverability
Comfort
Sweet Spot
Value
PRR Score
76PRR Score
Inside the frame
What's inside
◈
Face weaveCarbon 3K
Carbon fibre weave density of the hitting face.
◉
CoreEVA HR3
Foam core determines feel and vibration damping.
▽
ShapeRound
Head shape affects sweet spot size and balance.
⬡
SurfaceCarbon 3K
The texture of the outer face.
⊡
BalanceEven
Balance point determines power vs. control trade-off.
Our verdict
The Aerox 7.1 V2 is the Combat's twin with one point more handling: the same HR3 core and 3K face, the same power 78 and firm terms (66/65), maneuverability 69 against the Combat's 68. Weight documentation is incomplete on both. Value 78 matches too. Twins this identical from one brand resolve the usual way: confirm the specimens, buy the cheaper listing, and enjoy the springy HR3 response either way. Enebe's mid-tier remains one of the quieter value stories in the market; the naming overlap is the only genuinely confusing thing about it.
This shares the same lively HR3 core and carbon face as its sibling the Combat, with honest power delivery and working-brand pricing throughout — genuinely identical performance with a marginal handling edge. Weight isn't confirmed on either listing. Terms run firm across comfort and tolerance, and being this close to its twin, the sensible move is to confirm exact pricing on both before choosing.
No player reviews yet — own it? Be the first to review the Enebe Aerox 7.1 V 2.
