padelracketreviews
Racket comparison · 2026

Enebe Response 24K Violet vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.

Enebe Response 24K Violet
Enebe

Enebe Response 24K Violet

79
Best
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

91
PRR verdict

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red wins by 12 points

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red scores 91/100 against 79/100 for the Enebe Response 24K Violet. Its biggest edge is control (+9). On price, the Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red is currently €10 cheaper.

Score breakdown
Enebe Response 24K Violet
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Overall
79/100
91/100Best
Control
69
78Best
Power
81
90Best
Sweet spot
65
66Best
Maneuverability
68
72Best
Comfort
66
67Best
Specs
Enebe Response 24K Violet
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Shape
Round
Round
Balance
Even
Even
Weight
375 g
375 g
Core
EVA
EVA
Face material
Carbon 24k
Carbon 12K
Level
Intermediate
Intermediate
Playing style
Power
Power
Enebe Response 24K Violet

The Response 24K Violet is the EVA-cored colour variant of Enebe's premium-face bargain: the same genuine 24K weave, power 81 and crisp report, with the standard firm terms (control 69, comfort 66, tolerance 65). The Violet edition carries a small premium over the standard Response, dropping value to 70, and swaps the HR3 core for conventional EVA, a slightly less lively strike. The buying logic is simple: if the violet finish matters, the racket underneath remains sound; if it does not, the standard Response 24K is the same idea with better numbers and a better price.

170at PadelNuestroReview & prices
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160at PadelProShopReview & prices

Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.

Open compare tool
More comparisons
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05