Enebe Responseink vs Oxdog Hyper Pro+ 2.0
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Oxdog Hyper Pro+ 2.0 wins by 28 points
Oxdog Hyper Pro+ 2.0 scores 98/100 against 70/100 for the Enebe Responseink. Its biggest edge is power (+28).
“The Responseink is Enebe's entry hybrid: an even-balanced EVA build scoring a balanced 70/65 split with fair terms (comfort 69, tolerance 69) and honest handling (70). Weight and face documentation is incomplete. Value 78 keeps the working-brand promise at the entry tier. The card is the RS 9.1's near-twin with inkier paint, and the family rule resolves it as usual: between Enebe's entry listings, confirm the specimen and buy the cheaper. Either way new players get the brand's plain, findable honesty at fair money.”
“The Hyper Pro 2.0 is Oxdog's mainstream teardrop, and independent aggregate reviews (padel.fyi, 4 experts, 8.5/10) confirm power near 83 - matching our original figure exactly - but score control, maneuverability and sweet spot meaningfully higher than our original pass had them. Corrected here: this is a genuinely well-rounded attack-leaning all-rounder, not the middling card the previous numbers suggested.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool