Enebe Space 2.0 vs Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem Lite By Agustin Tapia
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem Lite By Agustin Tapia wins by 18 points
Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem Lite By Agustin Tapia scores 96/100 against 78/100 for the Enebe Space 2.0. Its biggest edge is sweet spot (+34). On price, the Enebe Space 2.0 is currently €53 cheaper.
“The Space 2.0 is Enebe's mid-tier attacker: a Black EVA core under a 12K face producing power 79 with the working brand's firm, direct delivery. Control 69, comfort 66 and tolerance 65 hold the standard strict-ish line, and maneuverability 68 wants some anticipation. Weight documentation is incomplete. Value 68 is unusual for Enebe: the Space prices above the brand's own Mustang and Response lines, both of which hit harder or feel crisper for less. The frame is honest; the positioning is not. Buy the Mustang or Response 24K instead unless this specific feel wins the demo.”
“The Xtrem Lite is the 2026 AT10 built for players who want Tapia's crispness at a weight that does not tax the shoulder: 365 g, even balance, teardrop head. The 12K carbon face over an EVA core keeps the strike snappy, and maneuverability 76 means the frame is on time at the net where heavier AT10s run late. Power 85 still finishes club-level points; control 79 keeps bandejas composed. Comfort 70 and tolerance 69 are liveable for the class. Value 72 is the only modest number: you pay signature money for the lighter build. A very easy racket to play well.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool
