padelracketreviews
Racket comparison · 2026

Enebe Space 2.0 vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.

Enebe Space 2.0
Enebe

Enebe Space 2.0

78
Best
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

91
PRR verdict

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red wins by 13 points

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red scores 91/100 against 78/100 for the Enebe Space 2.0. Its biggest edge is power (+11). On price, the Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red is currently €10 cheaper.

Score breakdown
Enebe Space 2.0
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Overall
78/100
91/100Best
Control
69
78Best
Power
79
90Best
Sweet spot
65
66Best
Maneuverability
68
72Best
Comfort
66
67Best
Specs
Enebe Space 2.0
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Shape
Round
Round
Balance
Even
Even
Weight
375 g
Core
Black EVA
EVA
Face material
Carbon 12K
Carbon 12K
Level
Intermediate
Intermediate
Playing style
Power
Power
Enebe Space 2.0

The Space 2.0 is Enebe's mid-tier attacker: a Black EVA core under a 12K face producing power 79 with the working brand's firm, direct delivery. Control 69, comfort 66 and tolerance 65 hold the standard strict-ish line, and maneuverability 68 wants some anticipation. Weight documentation is incomplete. Value 68 is unusual for Enebe: the Space prices above the brand's own Mustang and Response lines, both of which hit harder or feel crisper for less. The frame is honest; the positioning is not. Buy the Mustang or Response 24K instead unless this specific feel wins the demo.

170at PadelNuestroReview & prices
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160at PadelProShopReview & prices

Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.

Open compare tool
More comparisons
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05