padelracketreviews
Racket comparison · 2026

Head Gravity Team Light vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.

Head Gravity Team Light
Head

Head Gravity Team Light

73
Best
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

91
PRR verdict

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red wins by 18 points

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red scores 91/100 against 73/100 for the Head Gravity Team Light. Its biggest edge is power (+24). The Head Gravity Team Light answers back on sweet spot (+10). On price, the Head Gravity Team Light is currently €44 cheaper.

Score breakdown
Head Gravity Team Light
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Overall
73/100
91/100Best
Control
72
78Best
Power
66
90Best
Sweet spot
76Best
66
Maneuverability
78Best
72
Comfort
75Best
67
Specs
Head Gravity Team Light
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Shape
Round
Round
Balance
Head-light
Even
Weight
339 g
375 g
Core
Foam
EVA
Face material
Fibreglass
Carbon 12K
Level
Intermediate
Intermediate
Playing style
Power
Power
Head Gravity Team Light

The Gravity Team Light 2024 is Head's 340 g kindness package: a head-light foam-core build with a fibreglass face scoring maneuverability 78, comfort 75 and tolerance 76, with control 72 dependable and power 66 stating the physics. Value 76 is fair. The card is nearly interchangeable with the Radical Team Light's: same weight, same constituency, marginally different tune. For the light-frame audience, juniors, arm-managers, net specialists, either serves; the Radical edges the control numbers, this Gravity occasionally edges the price. Buy whichever fits the hand and the week.

117at TennisPoint UKReview & prices
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160at PadelProShopReview & prices

Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.

Open compare tool
More comparisons
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05