Joma Slam Pro Iconic vs Royal Padel 771 Efe Extreme
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Royal Padel 771 Efe Extreme wins by 1 point
Royal Padel 771 Efe Extreme scores 75/100 against 74/100 for the Joma Slam Pro Iconic. Its biggest edge is power (+4). The Joma Slam Pro Iconic answers back on maneuverability (+5). On price, the Joma Slam Pro Iconic is currently €16 cheaper.
“The Slam Pro Iconic scores as Joma's mid-line offer: a balanced 74/69 split with fair terms (comfort 69, tolerance 68) and honest handling (70). Full specification is unconfirmed, so materials, weight and shape go unverified; demo before committing. Value 76 continues the brand's pressure pricing. The recurring Joma verdict needs little editing: credible, sensibly-priced equipment from a badge still earning padel recognition, best bought after a demo and a comparison against the week's Dunlop and Drop Shot prices. The Iconic sits mid-family; the SF editions are kinder, the HRD fiercer.”
“The 771 Efe Extreme is Royal Padel's confusing entry: a 380 g diamond with a Soft EVA core scoring power 78, real pace, under a control label the card flatly contradicts (control 65). Comfort 66 benefits from the soft core; tolerance 65 and maneuverability 65 hold the house's deliberate terms. Value 74 is decent by brand standards. Read past the misfiled label: this is a budget Royal Padel attacker with the house cushion, for strong, patient players who want the deep strike at the smallest house invoice. Everyone else should demo the Fury vintage instead.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool