padelracketreviews
Racket comparison · 2026

Legend Invictus Classic vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.

Legend Invictus Classic
Legend

Legend Invictus Classic

Best
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

91
PRR verdict

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red wins by 14 points

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red scores 91/100 against 77/100 for the Legend Invictus Classic. Its biggest edge is power (+14). The Legend Invictus Classic answers back on sweet spot (+1). On price, the Legend Invictus Classic is currently €71 cheaper.

Score breakdown
Legend Invictus Classic
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Overall
77/100
91/100Best
Control
70
78Best
Power
76
90Best
Sweet spot
67Best
66
Maneuverability
72
72
Comfort
68Best
67
Specs
Legend Invictus Classic
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Shape
Round
Round
Balance
Head-light
Even
Weight
370 g
375 g
Core
Soft EVA
EVA
Face material
Carbon 3K
Carbon 12K
Level
Intermediate
Intermediate
Playing style
Power
Power
Legend Invictus Classic

The Legend Invictus Classic (2026) is a round-shaped power racket that leans on its EVA foam core to deliver a softer, more forgiving hit than its 'professional power' billing might suggest, making it better suited to advanced club players than true elite competitors. The head-light balance partially compensates for the hefty 370g frame, improving reaction time at the net, but the overall feel lacks the precision and liveliness expected at this price point from established brands. Players who want a comfortable, arm-friendly round racket with decent pop will find it serviceable, but those chasing top-tier control or outright smash power should look toward more proven alternatives.

89at PadelNuestroReview & prices
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160at PadelProShopReview & prices

Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.

Open compare tool
More comparisons
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05