Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem Lite By Agustin Tapia vs Quad Shark
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem Lite By Agustin Tapia wins by 16 points
Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem Lite By Agustin Tapia scores 96/100 against 80/100 for the Quad Shark. Its biggest edge is sweet spot (+32). On price, the Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem Lite By Agustin Tapia is currently €166 cheaper.
“The Xtrem Lite is the 2026 AT10 built for players who want Tapia's crispness at a weight that does not tax the shoulder: 365 g, even balance, teardrop head. The 12K carbon face over an EVA core keeps the strike snappy, and maneuverability 76 means the frame is on time at the net where heavier AT10s run late. Power 85 still finishes club-level points; control 79 keeps bandejas composed. Comfort 70 and tolerance 69 are liveable for the class. Value 72 is the only modest number: you pay signature money for the lighter build. A very easy racket to play well.”
“The Quad Shark is a mid-range diamond-shaped racket oriented toward power generation, but its identity is muddied by an inconsistent sweet spot and modest build quality that limits confidence on off-center strikes. The aggressive frame geometry hints at smash potential, but the lack of refined core technology means advanced players will find it punishing and unpredictable rather than rewarding. Budget-conscious beginners or casual players wanting a power-leaning shape without a premium price tag are its most forgiving audience.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool
