Nox At10 Genius Attack 12K Alum Xtrem By Agustin Tapia vs Siux Fenix Pro
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Nox At10 Genius Attack 12K Alum Xtrem By Agustin Tapia wins by 4 points
Nox At10 Genius Attack 12K Alum Xtrem By Agustin Tapia scores 90/100 against 86/100 for the Siux Fenix Pro. Its biggest edge is power (+5). The Siux Fenix Pro answers back on sweet spot (+2). On price, the Siux Fenix Pro is currently €13 cheaper.
“The Attack 12K Alum Xtrem is the diamond-headed, sharpened version of Tapia's 12K line, and it behaves exactly as that sentence implies. Power 92 arrives with an eagerness that flatters anyone with a real overhead; the EVA core keeps drives heavy and honest. Control falls to 74, comfort to 64 and tolerance to 63, which is the full price of the extra aggression, and the head asks for muscle in quick exchanges (maneuverability 68). This is for professional-level attackers who already own the technique. The standard 12K Xtrem is the kinder, more complete buy for almost everyone else.”
“The Fenix Pro Black brings Siux's attacking DNA down to a 360 g build, and the lighter platform suits it: power 87 still finishes points, but the frame gets to the volley earlier than its heavier stablemates (maneuverability 69, flattered further by the manageable weight). The 12K carbon face keeps the strike informative. Control 72 and tolerance 65 mark it as a commit-or-miss racket, and comfort 66 is firm without being cruel. Value 68 is the hesitation: it prices close to bigger names. For improving attackers who found the Electra heavy, the Fenix is the sensible sibling.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool
