Nox At10 Genius Attack 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia vs Quad Shark
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Nox At10 Genius Attack 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia wins by 15 points
Nox At10 Genius Attack 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia scores 95/100 against 80/100 for the Quad Shark. Its biggest edge is maneuverability (+26). On price, the Nox At10 Genius Attack 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia is currently €166 cheaper.
“The Attack version of Tapia's AT10 Genius 18K trades the standard model's manners for outright violence. The diamond head and 18K carbon face produce smash pace in the same conversation as anything we have scored (power 93), and the black EVA core keeps that pace honest on drives. The cost is real: control drops to 75, comfort 64 and tolerance 63 make it one of the most demanding frames in the range, and the head needs muscling at the net (maneuverability 68). This is a professional attacker's finisher. If your bandeja is a rally shot rather than a reset, look at the standard Genius instead.”
“The Quad Shark is a mid-range diamond-shaped racket oriented toward power generation, but its identity is muddied by an inconsistent sweet spot and modest build quality that limits confidence on off-center strikes. The aggressive frame geometry hints at smash potential, but the lack of refined core technology means advanced players will find it punishing and unpredictable rather than rewarding. Budget-conscious beginners or casual players wanting a power-leaning shape without a premium price tag are its most forgiving audience.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool
