padelracketreviews
Racket comparison · 2026

Nox At10 Pro Cup Har Dby Agustin Tapia vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.

Nox At10 Pro Cup Har Dby Agustin Tapia
Nox

Nox At10 Pro Cup Har Dby Agustin Tapia

Best
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

91
PRR verdict

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red wins by 10 points

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red scores 91/100 against 81/100 for the Nox At10 Pro Cup Har Dby Agustin Tapia. Its biggest edge is power (+10). The Nox At10 Pro Cup Har Dby Agustin Tapia answers back on sweet spot (+3).

Score breakdown
Nox At10 Pro Cup Har Dby Agustin Tapia
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Overall
81/100
91/100Best
Control
74
78Best
Power
80
90Best
Sweet spot
69Best
66
Maneuverability
72
72
Comfort
70Best
67
Specs
Nox At10 Pro Cup Har Dby Agustin Tapia
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Shape
Round
Round
Balance
Even
Even
Weight
375 g
Core
HR3 EVA
EVA
Face material
Fibreglass
Carbon 12K
Level
Intermediate
Intermediate
Playing style
Power
Power
Nox At10 Pro Cup Har Dby Agustin Tapia

The 2026 AT10 Pro Cup Har-D is the firmer of Tapia's Pro Cup pair: the HR3 core tuned toward response rather than absorption, under a fibreglass face that keeps the strike civil. Power 80 and control 74 make a genuinely useful club split, maneuverability 72 stays prompt, and comfort 70 with tolerance 69 holds the middle ground. Weight documentation is incomplete, so check the specimen. Value 78 is the argument: signature-line construction, balanced character, sensible money. For intermediates who want the AT10 badge with usable rather than terrifying performance, the Har-D is the honest pick.

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160at PadelProShopReview & prices

Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.

Open compare tool
More comparisons
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05