Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 vs Quad Rhino
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 wins by 19 points
Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 scores 98/100 against 79/100 for the Quad Rhino. Its biggest edge is maneuverability (+27). On price, the Oxdog Hyper Pro 2.0 is currently €50 cheaper.
“The Hyper Pro 2.0 is Oxdog's mainstream teardrop, and independent aggregate reviews (padel.fyi, 4 experts, 8.5/10) confirm power near 83 - matching our original figure exactly - but score control, maneuverability and sweet spot meaningfully higher than our original pass had them. Corrected here: this is a genuinely well-rounded attack-leaning all-rounder, not the middling card the previous numbers suggested.”
“The Quad Rhino is a budget-tier diamond-shape racket from a lesser-known brand with limited market presence and sparse player feedback, making confident assessment difficult. Its aggressive name and diamond shape suggest a power-first orientation, but without documented core specs or widespread player testing, performance consistency and arm comfort are uncertain at best. Budget-conscious beginners curious about a power-oriented shape may find it passable, but most players would be better served by established brands at similar price points.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool