padelracketreviews
Racket comparison · 2026

Royal Padel Whip Light Poly 25 vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.

Royal Padel Whip Light Poly 25
Royal Padel

Royal Padel Whip Light Poly 25

80
Best
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

91
PRR verdict

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red wins by 11 points

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red scores 91/100 against 80/100 for the Royal Padel Whip Light Poly 25. Its biggest edge is power (+12). The Royal Padel Whip Light Poly 25 answers back on sweet spot (+5). On price, the Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red is currently €52 cheaper.

Score breakdown
Royal Padel Whip Light Poly 25
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Overall
80/100
91/100Best
Control
71
78Best
Power
78
90Best
Sweet spot
71Best
66
Maneuverability
72
72
Comfort
72Best
67
Specs
Royal Padel Whip Light Poly 25
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Shape
Round
Round
Balance
Head-light
Even
Weight
352 g
375 g
Core
EVA
EVA
Face material
Fibreglass
Carbon 12K
Level
Beginner
Intermediate
Playing style
Control
Power
Royal Padel Whip Light Poly 25

The Whip Light Poly 25 is defined by its featherlight swing weight and quick-handling round-to-teardrop profile, making it a manageable option for recreational and intermediate players who prioritize wrist speed and defensive retrievals over raw punch. The polyethylene core delivers a softer, more forgiving feel than EVA alternatives, reducing arm fatigue during extended sessions, though it sacrifices the pop and depth that more advanced players will crave. Royal Padel remains a niche brand with limited global distribution and inconsistent quality control at this price tier, making it a reasonable but unremarkable choice compared to similarly priced offerings from Babolat or Head.

212at PadelDogsReview & prices
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160at PadelProShopReview & prices

Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.

Open compare tool
More comparisons
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05