Vibor A Vibor-A Mamba Yarara Pro 2.0 vs Wilson Blade Pro V3 V3
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Vibor A Vibor-A Mamba Yarara Pro 2.0 wins by 4 points
Vibor A Vibor-A Mamba Yarara Pro 2.0 scores 84/100 against 80/100 for the Wilson Blade Pro V3 V3. Its biggest edge is power (+5). The Wilson Blade Pro V3 V3 answers back on sweet spot (+2). On price, the Wilson Blade Pro V3 V3 is currently €55 cheaper.
“The Black Mamba Yarara Pro White 2.0 is a mid-aggressive diamond-shaped offensive racket from Vibor-A's upper-mid tier, built for players seeking punch and pace over surgical placement. The feel is relatively stiff and direct, rewarding clean contact but punishing off-centre hits with noticeable vibration, making it better suited to intermediate attackers with solid technique rather than beginners or arm-sensitive players. Vibor-A remains a niche brand with solid build quality relative to its price, but lacks the prestige-tier refinement of Bullpadel or Nox offerings at a comparable price point, making it a solid but unspectacular choice.”
“The Blade Pro V3 brings one of tennis's most famous names to padel with appropriately tidy results: a 365 g even-balanced EVA build scoring power 81 against control 71, quick enough (maneuverability 70) and fair on terms (comfort 67, tolerance 66). Face documentation is incomplete, so verify in hand. Value 74 is reasonable by Wilson's premium habits. The card describes a competent attacking all-rounder for improving players drawn to the badge, and the badge is doing some of the lifting at this price. Demo against the Spanish mid-market equivalents; keep it if the feel justifies the crest.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool
