padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Adidas Cross It Carbon CTRL 3.4 vs Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem By Agustin Tapia

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Adidas Cross It Carbon CTRL 3.4
Adidas

Adidas Cross It Carbon CTRL 3.4

Mejor
Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem By Agustin Tapia
Nox

Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem By Agustin Tapia

Veredicto PRR

Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem By Agustin Tapia gana por 8 puntos

Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem By Agustin Tapia obtiene 91/100 frente a 83/100 de la Adidas Cross It Carbon CTRL 3.4. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+14). La Adidas Cross It Carbon CTRL 3.4 responde en punto dulce (+8).

Desglose de puntuación
Adidas Cross It Carbon CTRL 3.4
Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem By Agustin Tapia
General
83/100
91/100Mejor
Control
84Mejor
80
Potencia
74
88Mejor
Punto dulce
75Mejor
67
Manejabilidad
74
74
Comodidad
74Mejor
68
Especificaciones
Adidas Cross It Carbon CTRL 3.4
Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem By Agustin Tapia
Forma
Lágrima
Lágrima
Balance
Equilibrado
Equilibrado
Peso
375 g
Núcleo
Goma EVA
Goma EVA
Material de la cara
Carbon 3K
Carbon 12K
Nivel
Intermedio
Profesional
Estilo de juego
Control
Potencia
Adidas Cross It Carbon CTRL 3.4

The Cross It Carbon CTRL 3.4 is adidas's mid-tier control offer, and the tuning is mature: an even-balanced teardrop with an EVA core where control 84 leads, comfort 74 and tolerance 75 forgive generously, and power 74 keeps just enough sting for the occasional finish. The 3K face adds welcome clarity to touch shots. Maneuverability 74 keeps it prompt. Weight documentation is incomplete, so confirm in hand. Value 78 rounds out a card with no bad numbers. For intermediates who have discovered that placement wins more club matches than pace, the 3.4 is an easy, sensible recommendation.

Nox At10 Genius 12K Alum Xtrem By Agustin Tapia

The 12K Alum Xtrem is the AT10 for players who want Tapia's attacking DNA with a slightly softer entry point. The 12K carbon face reads a touch more forgiving than the 18K on off-pace contact, while the teardrop shape and even balance keep the frame honest through bandejas and transitions. Power 88 finishes points; control 80 keeps the rest of your game intact. Comfort 68 and tolerance 67 are the familiar tax on a frame this capable. At value 78 it undercuts the flagship while giving away very little, which makes it the sensible pick in the range.

194en PadelProShopReseña y precios

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05