padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Adidas Cross It Light 3.4 vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Adidas Cross It Light 3.4
Adidas

Adidas Cross It Light 3.4

Mejor
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Veredicto PRR

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red gana por 11 puntos

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red obtiene 91/100 frente a 80/100 de la Adidas Cross It Light 3.4. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+22). La Adidas Cross It Light 3.4 responde en punto dulce (+15). En precio, la Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red está actualmente €5 más barata.

Desglose de puntuación
Adidas Cross It Light 3.4
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
General
80/100
91/100Mejor
Control
78
78
Potencia
68
90Mejor
Punto dulce
81Mejor
66
Manejabilidad
84Mejor
72
Comodidad
79Mejor
67
Especificaciones
Adidas Cross It Light 3.4
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balance
Cabeza ligera
Equilibrado
Peso
360 g
375 g
Núcleo
Goma EVA suave
Goma EVA
Material de la cara
Carbon 24k
Carbon 12K
Nivel
Intermedio
Intermedio
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Adidas Cross It Light 3.4

The Cross It Light 3.4 is adidas's speed experiment, and the numbers are startling: maneuverability 84 is the highest we score in this class, with tolerance 81 and comfort 79 completing a card built entirely around ease. The 360 g head-light build with a Soft EVA core swings itself; the 24K face is an unexpected luxury that keeps touch shots crisp. Power 68 is the transparent trade. Value 72 reflects the premium face. For net-forward players, fast-exchange specialists, and anyone whose game is hands rather than shoulders, this frame is nearly custom-built. Big hitters need not visit.

165en PadelNuestroReseña y precios
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160en PadelProShopReseña y precios

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05