padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Adidas Cross Lt 3.4 vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Adidas Cross Lt 3.4
Adidas

Adidas Cross Lt 3.4

Mejor
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Veredicto PRR

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red gana por 13 puntos

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red obtiene 91/100 frente a 78/100 de la Adidas Cross Lt 3.4. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+10).

Desglose de puntuación
Adidas Cross Lt 3.4
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
General
78/100
91/100Mejor
Control
70
78Mejor
Potencia
80
90Mejor
Punto dulce
66
66
Manejabilidad
70
72Mejor
Comodidad
67
67
Especificaciones
Adidas Cross Lt 3.4
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balance
Equilibrado
Peso
375 g
Núcleo
Goma EVA
Goma EVA
Material de la cara
Carbon 15k
Carbon 12K
Nivel
Intermedio
Intermedio
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Adidas Cross Lt 3.4

The Cross Lt 3.4 is the attacking cousin in adidas's Cross It family: an EVA core under a 15K face producing power 80 with a denser report than the line's control-tuned editions. Control 70 is workable, comfort 67 and tolerance 66 sit firm-but-fair, and maneuverability 70 stays honest. Weight documentation is incomplete, so check the specimen. Value 78 keeps it attractive. For improving attackers who like the Cross It platform's balance but want actual finishing pace, the Lt is the family member built for the job. The Light editions serve the speed-first; this one serves the finishers.

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160en PadelProShopReseña y precios

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05