padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Adidas Kardex Attl Glass Fiber Black vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Adidas Kardex Attl Glass Fiber Black
Adidas

Adidas Kardex Attl Glass Fiber Black

Mejor
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Veredicto PRR

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red gana por 21 puntos

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red obtiene 91/100 frente a 70/100 de la Adidas Kardex Attl Glass Fiber Black. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+16). En precio, la Adidas Kardex Attl Glass Fiber Black está actualmente €70 más barata.

Desglose de puntuación
Adidas Kardex Attl Glass Fiber Black
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
General
70/100
91/100Mejor
Control
64
78Mejor
Potencia
74
90Mejor
Punto dulce
66
66
Manejabilidad
66
72Mejor
Comodidad
67
67
Especificaciones
Adidas Kardex Attl Glass Fiber Black
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balance
Equilibrado
Peso
375 g
Núcleo
Goma EVA Performance
Goma EVA
Material de la cara
Fibra de vidrio
Carbon 12K
Nivel
Intermedio
Intermedio
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Adidas Kardex Attl Glass Fiber Black

The Kardex Attl Glass Fiber Black is adidas's plainest budget attacker: an EVA Performance core under a fibreglass face producing power 74 with fair-to-firm terms (comfort 67, tolerance 66) and honest handling (66). Weight documentation is incomplete. Value 72 sits behind the brand's own Drive and Neuvortx offers, which is the review: the Kardex is the same essential frame with less compelling arithmetic. The carousel rule applies within the trefoil as within Dunlop: one budget racket, several names, buy the cheapest documented specimen.

90en PadelNuestroReseña y precios
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160en PadelProShopReseña y precios

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05