padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Vairo Everlast Cross

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Mejor
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0
Babolat

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0

Vairo Everlast Cross
Vairo

Vairo Everlast Cross

Veredicto PRR

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 gana por 18 puntos

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 obtiene 91/100 frente a 73/100 de la Vairo Everlast Cross. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+18). La Vairo Everlast Cross responde en punto dulce (+2).

Desglose de puntuación
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0
Vairo Everlast Cross
General
91/100Mejor
73/100
Control
74Mejor
65
Potencia
94Mejor
76
Punto dulce
61
63Mejor
Manejabilidad
66
66
Comodidad
62
64Mejor
Especificaciones
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0
Vairo Everlast Cross
Forma
Diamante
Diamante
Balance
Cabeza pesada
Cabeza pesada
Peso
365–375 g
375 g
Núcleo
Black EVA
Goma EVA
Material de la cara
Carbon 3K
Nivel
Avanzado
Avanzado
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0

The Technical Viper 3.0 is the bluntest instrument in Babolat's range and makes no apology for it. Head-heavy, diamond, Black EVA behind a Carbon 3K face: swing hard and the ball leaves at 94-power pace, the highest tier we score. Everything else is the price of admission. Control 74 asks you to aim with your feet, comfort 62 makes it one of the harshest hits at tour level, and tolerance 61 turns mishits into nothing balls. Maneuverability 66 means late reactions at the net stay late. For a physically strong, technically clean attacker it is devastating. For anyone else it is a fast route to a sore elbow.

223en PadelProShopReseña y precios
Vairo Everlast Cross

The Everlast Cross is Vairo's current committed diamond: a head-heavy 375 g EVA build producing power 76 with the genre's full invoice (control 65, comfort 64, tolerance 63). Face documentation is incomplete. Value 82 keeps the Argentine pressure pricing working. The card is the budget-attack formula at its most familiar: head mass for the overhead, honest violence, strict terms, unanswerable arithmetic. For conditioned budget attackers comparing the Lok and Bomba benches, the Cross belongs in the conversation; for developing technique, the same standing warning applies.

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05