padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Dunlop Galaxy vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Dunlop Galaxy
Dunlop

Dunlop Galaxy

Mejor
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Veredicto PRR

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red gana por 20 puntos

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red obtiene 91/100 frente a 71/100 de la Dunlop Galaxy. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+17). En precio, la Dunlop Galaxy está actualmente €100 más barata.

Desglose de puntuación
Dunlop Galaxy
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
General
71/100
91/100Mejor
Control
65
78Mejor
Potencia
73
90Mejor
Punto dulce
65
66Mejor
Manejabilidad
68
72Mejor
Comodidad
66
67Mejor
Especificaciones
Dunlop Galaxy
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balance
Equilibrado
Equilibrado
Peso
375 g
Núcleo
Goma EVA media
Goma EVA
Material de la cara
Carbon 12K
Nivel
Intermedio
Intermedio
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Dunlop Galaxy

The Galaxy is Dunlop's plainest budget attacker yet: a medium-EVA build scoring power 73 with fair terms (comfort 66, tolerance 65) and honest handling (68). Weight documentation is incomplete. Value 82 leads the brand's budget wardrobe. The Inferno-Infinity-Nemesis-Galaxy naming carousel now has four horses, and they remain one racket: this one currently carries the best arithmetic, which by the family's own rules makes it this week's correct purchase. Confirm the specimen, prefer your arm's core, pay the least. The quiet competence is guaranteed regardless.

60en PadelNuestroReseña y precios
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160en PadelProShopReseña y precios

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05