padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Dunlop Impact Carbon Pro Ltd Blue vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Dunlop Impact Carbon Pro Ltd Blue
Dunlop

Dunlop Impact Carbon Pro Ltd Blue

Mejor
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Veredicto PRR

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red gana por 19 puntos

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red obtiene 91/100 frente a 72/100 de la Dunlop Impact Carbon Pro Ltd Blue. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+18).

Desglose de puntuación
Dunlop Impact Carbon Pro Ltd Blue
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
General
72/100
91/100Mejor
Control
66
78Mejor
Potencia
72
90Mejor
Punto dulce
66
66
Manejabilidad
68
72Mejor
Comodidad
67
67
Especificaciones
Dunlop Impact Carbon Pro Ltd Blue
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balance
Equilibrado
Equilibrado
Peso
375 g
Núcleo
Goma EVA
Goma EVA
Material de la cara
Fibra de vidrio
Carbon 12K
Nivel
Intermedio
Intermedio
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Dunlop Impact Carbon Pro Ltd Blue

The Impact Carbon Pro Ltd Blue is Dunlop's budget all-rounder: an EVA core under a fibreglass face scoring a moderate 72/66 split with fair terms (comfort 67, tolerance 66) and honest handling (68). Weight documentation is incomplete. Value 76 is reasonable. The card sits between the brand's attack machinery and its control conversions without committing to either, which makes it the Dunlop for players who have not chosen an identity yet. The family's better-focused options usually serve better; the Impact serves the undecided at a fair price.

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160en PadelProShopReseña y precios

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05