padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Head Evo Extreme vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Head Evo Extreme
Head

Head Evo Extreme

Mejor
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Veredicto PRR

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red gana por 23 puntos

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red obtiene 91/100 frente a 68/100 de la Head Evo Extreme. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+20). En precio, la Head Evo Extreme está actualmente €104 más barata.

Desglose de puntuación
Head Evo Extreme
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
General
68/100
91/100Mejor
Control
63
78Mejor
Potencia
70
90Mejor
Punto dulce
66
66
Manejabilidad
68
72Mejor
Comodidad
67
67
Especificaciones
Head Evo Extreme
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Forma
Diamante
Redonda
Balance
Equilibrado
Peso
350 g
375 g
Núcleo
Goma EVA suave
Goma EVA
Material de la cara
Fibra de vidrio
Carbon 12K
Nivel
Principiante
Intermedio
Estilo de juego
Polivalente
Potencia
Head Evo Extreme

The Evo Extreme 2026 refreshes Head's keen starter at a confirmed 350 g: a Soft EVA core under the familiar fibreglass face, scoring the family's standard power 70 with fair-to-firm terms (comfort 67, tolerance 66) and honest handling (68). Value 78 matches the 2025 edition exactly, which makes the vintage question purely a price question. The 2026 is ten grams lighter and softer-cored on paper; in practice both are the same athletic-beginner offer. Buy whichever Extreme is cheaper this week and swing with intent.

56en PadelProShopReseña y precios
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160en PadelProShopReseña y precios

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05