padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia vs Royal Padel 35Th Anniversary Poly

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Mejor
Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia
Nox

Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia

Royal Padel 35Th Anniversary Poly
Royal Padel

Royal Padel 35Th Anniversary Poly

Veredicto PRR

Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia gana por 13 puntos

Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia obtiene 93/100 frente a 80/100 de la Royal Padel 35Th Anniversary Poly. Su mayor ventaja está en control (+16). La Royal Padel 35Th Anniversary Poly responde en comodidad (+1).

Desglose de puntuación
Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia
Royal Padel 35Th Anniversary Poly
General
93/100Mejor
80/100
Control
84Mejor
68
Potencia
88Mejor
83
Punto dulce
68
68
Manejabilidad
76Mejor
66
Comodidad
70
71Mejor
Especificaciones
Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia
Royal Padel 35Th Anniversary Poly
Forma
Lágrima
Lágrima
Balance
Equilibrado
Peso
360–375 g
375 g
Núcleo
Black EVA
Material de la cara
Carbon 18K
Nivel
Profesional
Profesional
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Nox At10 Genius 18K Alum By Agustin Tapia

Tapia's AT10 Genius 18K Alum is the rare frame that hits like an attacker's racket but doesn't fall apart when you defend. The 18K carbon face over a black EVA core gives a dense, springy strike: drives carry pace (power 88), yet the teardrop shape and even balance keep the head obedient on bandejas and blocks (control 84). It sits at the top of our table because it asks fewer sacrifices than a pure diamond. The compromises are familiar: comfort 70 means the stiffness reaches your elbow eventually, and tolerance 68 still wants near-middle contact.

215en PadelProShopReseña y precios
Royal Padel 35Th Anniversary Poly

The Royal Padel 35th Anniversary Poly is defined by its punchy, teardrop-driven power delivery through a polyethylene core that generates solid pace on smashes and deep drives without the refined dampening of premium EVA constructions. The head-light balance partially offsets the 375g weight, keeping reaction volleys manageable, but off-centre shots feel noticeably harsh and the sweet spot is unforgiving enough to punish inconsistent ball-striking. Advanced attacking players who prioritize raw power and can consistently hit clean will enjoy this racket, but at its price point it faces stiff competition from better-rounded options from Head, Bullpadel, and Nox.

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05