padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Nox Future Attack 12K Alum vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Nox Future Attack 12K Alum
Nox

Nox Future Attack 12K Alum

Mejor
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Veredicto PRR

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red gana por 11 puntos

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red obtiene 91/100 frente a 80/100 de la Nox Future Attack 12K Alum. Su mayor ventaja está en control (+10).

Desglose de puntuación
Nox Future Attack 12K Alum
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
General
80/100
91/100Mejor
Control
68
78Mejor
Potencia
83
90Mejor
Punto dulce
63
66Mejor
Manejabilidad
67
72Mejor
Comodidad
64
67Mejor
Especificaciones
Nox Future Attack 12K Alum
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balance
Equilibrado
Peso
375 g
375 g
Núcleo
Goma EVA
Goma EVA
Material de la cara
Carbon 12K
Carbon 12K
Nivel
Intermedio
Intermedio
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Nox Future Attack 12K Alum

The Future Attack 12K Alum is the aggressive half of Nox's new Future platform: an EVA core under the 12K face producing power 83, with the strict company that output keeps: control 68, comfort 64, tolerance 63. The strike is dense and immediate, and drives arrive with intent. Value 80 is the differentiator: this is current-generation attacking tech at a price the AT10 line cannot match. Maneuverability 67 wants anticipation. For improving attackers who want new-platform materials without signature pricing, the Future Attack is the rational aggressive buy in Nox's 2025 list.

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160en PadelProShopReseña y precios

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05