padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Nox Future Hybrid 12K Alum vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Nox Future Hybrid 12K Alum
Nox

Nox Future Hybrid 12K Alum

Mejor
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Veredicto PRR

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red gana por 11 puntos

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red obtiene 91/100 frente a 80/100 de la Nox Future Hybrid 12K Alum. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+12). La Nox Future Hybrid 12K Alum responde en punto dulce (+1).

Desglose de puntuación
Nox Future Hybrid 12K Alum
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
General
80/100
91/100Mejor
Control
73
78Mejor
Potencia
78
90Mejor
Punto dulce
67Mejor
66
Manejabilidad
71
72Mejor
Comodidad
68Mejor
67
Especificaciones
Nox Future Hybrid 12K Alum
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balance
Equilibrado
Equilibrado
Peso
375 g
375 g
Núcleo
Goma EVA
Goma EVA
Material de la cara
Carbon 12K
Carbon 12K
Nivel
Intermedio
Intermedio
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Nox Future Hybrid 12K Alum

The standard Future Hybrid 12K Alum is the single-weight edition of Nox's balanced new platform: a 375 g even-balanced build with the 12K face scoring a useful 78/73 power-control split, fair terms (comfort 68, tolerance 67) and workable handling (71). Value 80 keeps the platform's arithmetic attractive. Against the NFA edition the difference is fit, not character: the NFA offers a weight spread, this version offers one honest 375 g configuration for slightly less. For intermediates who fit the standard weight anyway, this is the same rational buy minus the option you did not need.

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160en PadelProShopReseña y precios

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05