padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Royal Padel Rp 36 Aniversario Poly vs Royal Padel Rp Whip Poly

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Royal Padel Rp 36 Aniversario Poly
Royal Padel

Royal Padel Rp 36 Aniversario Poly

Mejor
Royal Padel Rp Whip Poly
Royal Padel

Royal Padel Rp Whip Poly

Veredicto PRR

Royal Padel Rp Whip Poly gana por 2 puntos

Royal Padel Rp Whip Poly obtiene 83/100 frente a 81/100 de la Royal Padel Rp 36 Aniversario Poly. Su mayor ventaja está en control (+4). La Royal Padel Rp 36 Aniversario Poly responde en potencia (+2).

Desglose de puntuación
Royal Padel Rp 36 Aniversario Poly
Royal Padel Rp Whip Poly
General
81/100
83/100Mejor
Control
69
73Mejor
Potencia
84Mejor
82
Punto dulce
68
70Mejor
Manejabilidad
64
66Mejor
Comodidad
70
72Mejor
Especificaciones
Royal Padel Rp 36 Aniversario Poly
Royal Padel Rp Whip Poly
Forma
Lágrima
Redonda
Balance
Cabeza ligera
Peso
380 g
385 g
Núcleo
Material de la cara
Nivel
Avanzado
Intermedio
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Royal Padel Rp 36 Aniversario Poly

The RP 36 Aniversario Poly celebrates thirty-six years of Royal Padel's stubborn craft: a 380 g teardrop around the house polyethylene core, striking deep and elastic with power 84, the strongest number the poly line produces. Comfort 70 keeps the tradition of softness under mass. The familiar costs apply: maneuverability 64 wants deliberate positioning, control 69 wants early targets, and core documentation is incomplete in our records. Value 72 is decent for a commemorative build. For poly devotees this is the one to own from recent years; for newcomers to the feel, demo the standard Whip first.

Royal Padel Rp Whip Poly

The RP Whip Poly is Royal Padel at its most traditional: a substantial 385 g frame, tuned head-light so the mass works for you rather than against you. The strike is deep and cushioned, comfort 72 despite the heft, and power 82 comes from that mass moving through the ball rather than from stiffness. Control 73 and tolerance 70 are fair. The costs: maneuverability 66 means fast exchanges need anticipation, core documentation is incomplete, and value 66 carries the boutique premium. For strong players who like a heavy, planted, old-school feel, nothing mainstream replicates this; lighter-armed players should demo with honesty.

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05