padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Royal Padel Rp Race vs Royal Padel Rp Whip Poly

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Royal Padel Rp Race
Royal Padel

Royal Padel Rp Race

Mejor
Royal Padel Rp Whip Poly
Royal Padel

Royal Padel Rp Whip Poly

Veredicto PRR

Royal Padel Rp Whip Poly gana por 1 punto

Royal Padel Rp Whip Poly obtiene 83/100 frente a 82/100 de la Royal Padel Rp Race. Su mayor ventaja está en control (+4). La Royal Padel Rp Race responde en potencia (+3).

Desglose de puntuación
Royal Padel Rp Race
Royal Padel Rp Whip Poly
General
82/100
83/100Mejor
Control
69
73Mejor
Potencia
85Mejor
82
Punto dulce
67
70Mejor
Manejabilidad
64
66Mejor
Comodidad
70
72Mejor
Especificaciones
Royal Padel Rp Race
Royal Padel Rp Whip Poly
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balance
Cabeza ligera
Peso
380 g
385 g
Núcleo
Goma EVA media
Material de la cara
Carbon 3K
Nivel
Intermedio
Intermedio
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Royal Padel Rp Race

The RP Race is Royal Padel's power statement: 380 g of handmade frame with a medium EVA core and 3K face, producing power 85 the old-fashioned way, through mass moving deliberately through the ball. The strike is deep, planted and surprisingly civil (comfort 70). The structural costs are unavoidable: maneuverability 64 makes fast net exchanges a liability without anticipation, and control 69 wants targets chosen early. Value 68 carries the boutique premium. For strong, deliberate players who find modern light frames twitchy, the Race offers something the mainstream has stopped making. Everyone else should demo with their honest reflexes.

Royal Padel Rp Whip Poly

The RP Whip Poly is Royal Padel at its most traditional: a substantial 385 g frame, tuned head-light so the mass works for you rather than against you. The strike is deep and cushioned, comfort 72 despite the heft, and power 82 comes from that mass moving through the ball rather than from stiffness. Control 73 and tolerance 70 are fair. The costs: maneuverability 66 means fast exchanges need anticipation, core documentation is incomplete, and value 66 carries the boutique premium. For strong players who like a heavy, planted, old-school feel, nothing mainstream replicates this; lighter-armed players should demo with honesty.

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05