padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red vs Siux Trilogy Pro 2026 Ash Green

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Mejor
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Siux Trilogy Pro 2026 Ash Green
Siux

Siux Trilogy Pro 2026 Ash Green

Veredicto PRR

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red gana por 6 puntos

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red obtiene 91/100 frente a 85/100 de la Siux Trilogy Pro 2026 Ash Green. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+8). La Siux Trilogy Pro 2026 Ash Green responde en punto dulce (+4). En precio, la Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red está actualmente €1 más barata.

Desglose de puntuación
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux Trilogy Pro 2026 Ash Green
General
91/100Mejor
85/100
Control
78
78
Potencia
90Mejor
82
Punto dulce
66
70Mejor
Manejabilidad
72
74Mejor
Comodidad
67
71Mejor
Especificaciones
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux Trilogy Pro 2026 Ash Green
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balance
Equilibrado
Cabeza ligera
Peso
375 g
365 g
Núcleo
Goma EVA
Goma EVA
Material de la cara
Carbon 12K
Carbon 24k
Nivel
Intermedio
Intermedio
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160en PadelProShopReseña y precios
Siux Trilogy Pro 2026 Ash Green

The Ash Green Trilogy Pro is the same likeable frame as the Noir Fog in quieter clothes: head-light handling that makes the 375 g spec irrelevant, a 24K carbon face for a crisp, premium strike, and a balanced 82/78 power-control split that suits players who refuse to specialise. Comfort 71 and tolerance 70 keep long sessions friendly, and maneuverability 74 means you are rarely late. Value 72 nudges slightly ahead of its sibling depending on the week's pricing. For intermediate all-courters wanting one dependable, slightly premium racket, either Trilogy Pro colourway earns the shortlist.

161en PadelProShopReseña y precios

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05