padelracketreviews
Comparativa de palas · 2026

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red vs Vibor A Titan Black Light

Cara a cara en puntuaciones PRR, especificaciones y precios en directo — analizadas de forma independiente con la misma metodología. Actualizado a diario.

Mejor
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Vibor A Titan Black Light
Vibor A

Vibor A Titan Black Light

Veredicto PRR

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red gana por 10 puntos

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red obtiene 91/100 frente a 81/100 de la Vibor A Titan Black Light. Su mayor ventaja está en potencia (+9). La Vibor A Titan Black Light responde en punto dulce (+1). En precio, la Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red está actualmente €190 más barata.

Desglose de puntuación
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Vibor A Titan Black Light
General
91/100Mejor
81/100
Control
78Mejor
70
Potencia
90Mejor
81
Punto dulce
66
67Mejor
Manejabilidad
72
72
Comodidad
67
68Mejor
Especificaciones
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Vibor A Titan Black Light
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balance
Equilibrado
Equilibrado
Peso
375 g
340 g
Núcleo
Goma EVA
Goma EVA
Material de la cara
Carbon 12K
Nivel
Intermedio
Intermedio
Estilo de juego
Potencia
Potencia
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160en PadelProShopReseña y precios
Vibor A Titan Black Light

The Titan Black Light is Vibor-A's featherweight: 340 g, among the lightest serious frames on the market, with an EVA core keeping power at a genuinely surprising 81. Maneuverability 72 and the sheer ease of swinging define the experience; comfort 68 and tolerance 67 are reasonable. Control 70 is workable. The obstacle is value 58: the light spec carries a premium that puts this card against far stronger competition. For players who specifically need minimum weight, juniors stepping up, lighter-framed players, anyone managing a shoulder, it earns consideration; for everyone else the price defies the arithmetic.

350en PadelNuestroReseña y precios

¿Quieres otra comparativa? Compara cualquier pala de nuestra base de datos, una al lado de la otra.

Abrir comparador
Más comparativas
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05