padelracketreviews
Comparativo de raquetes · 2026

Enebe Response 3K Evo vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Frente a frente em pontuações PRR, especificações e preços em direto — analisadas de forma independente com a mesma metodologia. Atualizado diariamente.

Enebe Response 3K Evo
Enebe

Enebe Response 3K Evo

Melhor
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Veredito PRR

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red ganha por 12 pontos

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red obtém 91/100 contra 79/100 da Enebe Response 3K Evo. A sua maior vantagem está em potência (+10). Em preço, a Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red está atualmente €20 mais barata.

Detalhe da pontuação
Enebe Response 3K Evo
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Geral
79/100
91/100Melhor
Controlo
70
78Melhor
Potência
80
90Melhor
Ponto doce
65
66Melhor
Manobrabilidade
68
72Melhor
Conforto
66
67Melhor
Especificações
Enebe Response 3K Evo
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balanço
Equilibrado
Equilibrado
Peso
370 g
375 g
Núcleo
Espuma EVA
Espuma EVA
Material da face
Carbon 3K
Carbon 12K
Nível
Intermédio
Intermédio
Estilo de jogo
Potência
Potência
Enebe Response 3K Evo

The Enebe Response 3K Evo is a power-oriented hybrid that delivers a punchy, direct feel on smashes and drives, benefiting from its 3K carbon construction and EVA foam core that balances stiffness with just enough shock absorption. At 370g with an even balance, it sits in a workable middle ground but lacks the refined touch and forgiveness that top-tier advanced rackets offer at this price range. Players transitioning from intermediate to advanced who prioritize pace over finesse will find it a solid stepping stone, though dedicated advanced players may quickly outgrow its ceiling.

180em PadelNuestroAnálise e preços
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160em PadelProShopAnálise e preços

Queres outra comparação? Compara qualquer raquete da nossa base de dados, lado a lado.

Abrir comparador
Mais comparações
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05