padelracketreviews
Comparativo de raquetes · 2026

Enebe Response Royal vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Frente a frente em pontuações PRR, especificações e preços em direto — analisadas de forma independente com a mesma metodologia. Atualizado diariamente.

Enebe Response Royal
Enebe

Enebe Response Royal

Melhor
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Veredito PRR

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red ganha por 18 pontos

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red obtém 91/100 contra 73/100 da Enebe Response Royal. A sua maior vantagem está em potência (+16). A Enebe Response Royal responde em ponto doce (+2).

Detalhe da pontuação
Enebe Response Royal
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Geral
73/100
91/100Melhor
Controlo
66
78Melhor
Potência
74
90Melhor
Ponto doce
68Melhor
66
Manobrabilidade
69
72Melhor
Conforto
68Melhor
67
Especificações
Enebe Response Royal
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balanço
Equilibrado
Equilibrado
Peso
375 g
Núcleo
HR3 EVA
Espuma EVA
Material da face
Fibra de vidro
Carbon 12K
Nível
Intermédio
Intermédio
Estilo de jogo
Potência
Potência
Enebe Response Royal

The Response Royal is the soft entry of Enebe's Response family: an HR3 core under a fibreglass face scoring power 74 with the liveliest terms in the line's lower tier (comfort 68, tolerance 68) and honest handling (69). Weight documentation is incomplete. Value 76 is honest. The HR3 spring plus fibreglass civility makes this the Response for improving players not yet ready for the 24K's crisp demands. The family rule is well-worn by now: Enebe's shelf is crowded and honest, so buy the edition whose feel and price align in the week you shop.

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160em PadelProShopAnálise e preços

Queres outra comparação? Compara qualquer raquete da nossa base de dados, lado a lado.

Abrir comparador
Mais comparações
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05