padelracketreviews
Comparativo de raquetes · 2026

Joma Rookie vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Frente a frente em pontuações PRR, especificações e preços em direto — analisadas de forma independente com a mesma metodologia. Atualizado diariamente.

Joma Rookie
Joma

Joma Rookie

Melhor
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Veredito PRR

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red ganha por 23 pontos

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red obtém 91/100 contra 68/100 da Joma Rookie. A sua maior vantagem está em potência (+22). A Joma Rookie responde em ponto doce (+3).

Detalhe da pontuação
Joma Rookie
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Geral
68/100
91/100Melhor
Controlo
64
78Melhor
Potência
68
90Melhor
Ponto doce
69Melhor
66
Manobrabilidade
70
72Melhor
Conforto
69Melhor
67
Especificações
Joma Rookie
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balanço
Cabeça leve
Equilibrado
Peso
375 g
Núcleo
Espuma EVA
Espuma EVA
Material da face
Carbon 12K
Nível
Principiante
Intermédio
Estilo de jogo
Potência
Potência
Joma Rookie

The Joma Rookie 2026 is a forgiving, lightweight entry-level racket built around a round shape and head-light balance that prioritises easy handling over raw performance. The EVA foam core delivers a soft, muted feel that cushions mishits reasonably well, making it accessible for absolute beginners finding their footing at the net, though it lacks the responsiveness and build quality that budget competitors from Bullpadel or Head offer at similar price points. Players just starting out will appreciate how little it tires the arm, but they will quickly outgrow its limited power ceiling and unremarkable construction within a season.

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160em PadelProShopAnálise e preços

Queres outra comparação? Compara qualquer raquete da nossa base de dados, lado a lado.

Abrir comparador
Mais comparações
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05