padelracketreviews
Comparativo de raquetes · 2026

Royal Padel Rp Whip Poly vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Frente a frente em pontuações PRR, especificações e preços em direto — analisadas de forma independente com a mesma metodologia. Atualizado diariamente.

Royal Padel Rp Whip Poly
Royal Padel

Royal Padel Rp Whip Poly

Melhor
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Veredito PRR

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red ganha por 8 pontos

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red obtém 91/100 contra 83/100 da Royal Padel Rp Whip Poly. A sua maior vantagem está em potência (+8). A Royal Padel Rp Whip Poly responde em conforto (+5).

Detalhe da pontuação
Royal Padel Rp Whip Poly
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Geral
83/100
91/100Melhor
Controlo
73
78Melhor
Potência
82
90Melhor
Ponto doce
70Melhor
66
Manobrabilidade
66
72Melhor
Conforto
72Melhor
67
Especificações
Royal Padel Rp Whip Poly
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balanço
Cabeça leve
Equilibrado
Peso
385 g
375 g
Núcleo
Espuma EVA
Material da face
Carbon 12K
Nível
Intermédio
Intermédio
Estilo de jogo
Potência
Potência
Royal Padel Rp Whip Poly

The RP Whip Poly is Royal Padel at its most traditional: a substantial 385 g frame, tuned head-light so the mass works for you rather than against you. The strike is deep and cushioned, comfort 72 despite the heft, and power 82 comes from that mass moving through the ball rather than from stiffness. Control 73 and tolerance 70 are fair. The costs: maneuverability 66 means fast exchanges need anticipation, core documentation is incomplete, and value 66 carries the boutique premium. For strong players who like a heavy, planted, old-school feel, nothing mainstream replicates this; lighter-armed players should demo with honesty.

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160em PadelProShopAnálise e preços

Queres outra comparação? Compara qualquer raquete da nossa base de dados, lado a lado.

Abrir comparador
Mais comparações
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05