padelracketreviews
Comparativo de raquetes · 2026

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red vs Softee Trionic Fiber

Frente a frente em pontuações PRR, especificações e preços em direto — analisadas de forma independente com a mesma metodologia. Atualizado diariamente.

Melhor
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Softee Trionic Fiber
Softee

Softee Trionic Fiber

Veredito PRR

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red ganha por 23 pontos

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red obtém 91/100 contra 68/100 da Softee Trionic Fiber. A sua maior vantagem está em potência (+22). A Softee Trionic Fiber responde em ponto doce (+2). Em preço, a Softee Trionic Fiber está atualmente €93 mais barata.

Detalhe da pontuação
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Softee Trionic Fiber
Geral
91/100Melhor
68/100
Controlo
78Melhor
64
Potência
90Melhor
68
Ponto doce
66
68Melhor
Manobrabilidade
72Melhor
70
Conforto
67
69Melhor
Especificações
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Softee Trionic Fiber
Forma
Redonda
Redonda
Balanço
Equilibrado
Equilibrado
Peso
375 g
Núcleo
Espuma EVA
Espuma EVA suave
Material da face
Carbon 12K
Fibra de vidro
Nível
Intermédio
Intermédio
Estilo de jogo
Potência
Potência
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160em PadelProShopAnálise e preços
Softee Trionic Fiber

The Softee Trionic Fiber is a basic entry-level hybrid that offers adequate forgiveness and manageable swing weight for absolute beginners, but its EVA core feels cheap and underdeveloped compared to rivals at a similar price point. The touch is vague and the power delivery is inconsistent, making it hard to build confidence at net or on drives. Budget-conscious newcomers just picking up a racket might tolerate it short-term, but almost any offering from Head, Bullpadel, or Nox at the same price delivers a meaningfully better experience.

67em PadelNuestroAnálise e preços

Queres outra comparação? Compara qualquer raquete da nossa base de dados, lado a lado.

Abrir comparador
Mais comparações
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05