padelracketreviews
Racket comparison · 2026

Adidas Cross IT LIGHT Martha Ortega 3.3 vs Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.

Adidas Cross IT LIGHT Martha Ortega 3.3
Adidas

Adidas Cross IT LIGHT Martha Ortega 3.3

79
Best
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Siux

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

91
PRR verdict

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red wins by 12 points

Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red scores 91/100 against 79/100 for the Adidas Cross IT LIGHT Martha Ortega 3.3. Its biggest edge is power (+26). The Adidas Cross IT LIGHT Martha Ortega 3.3 answers back on sweet spot (+18). On price, the Adidas Cross IT LIGHT Martha Ortega 3.3 is currently €27 cheaper.

Score breakdown
Adidas Cross IT LIGHT Martha Ortega 3.3
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Overall
79/100
91/100Best
Control
78
78
Power
64
90Best
Sweet spot
84Best
66
Maneuverability
86Best
72
Comfort
82Best
67
Specs
Adidas Cross IT LIGHT Martha Ortega 3.3
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red
Shape
Round
Round
Balance
Head-light
Even
Weight
375 g
Core
EVA
EVA
Face material
Carbon / Fibreglass
Carbon 12K
Level
Beginner
Intermediate
Playing style
Control
Power
Adidas Cross IT LIGHT Martha Ortega 3.3

The Cross IT LIGHT Martha Ortega 3.3 is defined by its forgiving round shape and head-light balance, making it easy to swing and redirect balls for complete beginners who are still developing their technique. The EVA foam core and carbon-fibreglass surface blend deliver a soft, muted feel with decent touch but limited power ceiling, meaning players will quickly outgrow it as their game progresses. At its price point it faces stiff competition from better-specced beginner options from Babolat and Head, making the value proposition its weakest link unless purchased on discount.

134at PadelProShopReview & prices
Siux Electra Pro 2026 Fire Red

The Electra Pro in Fire Red is a lot of racket for the intermediate bracket it is aimed at: power 90 from the EVA core and Carbon 12K face means short lobs get finished properly, and the even balance keeps the frame from feeling like a sledgehammer between shots. Control 78 is trustworthy on drives. The warnings are the usual ones at this output level: comfort 67 is firm for players still building technique, and tolerance 66 will punish the mishits that intermediates naturally produce. If you are an improving attacker with sound basics, it is a thrilling step up; if your contact is still streaky, demo first.

160at PadelProShopReview & prices

Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.

Open compare tool
More comparisons
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05