Adidas Granite 2.0 Attk vs Babolat Technical Viper 3.0
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 wins by 14 points
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 scores 91/100 against 77/100 for the Adidas Granite 2.0 Attk. Its biggest edge is power (+14). The Adidas Granite 2.0 Attk answers back on sweet spot (+4). On price, the Adidas Granite 2.0 Attk is currently €167 cheaper.
“Middle a smash with the Granite 2.0 Attk and you understand the whole racket: the head-heavy teardrop and EVA core send the ball down with genuine violence (power 80), and the Carbon 3K face reports the contact honestly. Play it off-centre and you understand the rest: tolerance 65 hands the mishit straight back, and the stiffness reaches your elbow by the third set (comfort 66). Control 68 wants your targets chosen before the swing starts. This is adidas's budget attack frame done properly, and value 82 is the closing argument: real finishing pace at mid-market money, for advanced players whose technique has already paid the entry fee.”
“The Technical Viper 3.0 is the bluntest instrument in Babolat's range and makes no apology for it. Head-heavy, diamond, Black EVA behind a Carbon 3K face: swing hard and the ball leaves at 94-power pace, the highest tier we score. Everything else is the price of admission. Control 74 asks you to aim with your feet, comfort 62 makes it one of the harshest hits at tour level, and tolerance 61 turns mishits into nothing balls. Maneuverability 66 means late reactions at the net stay late. For a physically strong, technically clean attacker it is devastating. For anyone else it is a fast route to a sore elbow.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool
