Adidas Metalbone HRD+ 3.4 vs Nox Ea10 Ventus Attack 12K Xtrem
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ 3.4 wins by 2 points
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ 3.4 scores 89/100 against 87/100 for the Nox Ea10 Ventus Attack 12K Xtrem. Its biggest edge is power (+3). On price, the Adidas Metalbone HRD+ 3.4 is currently €32 cheaper.
“The Adidas Metalbone HRD+ 3.4 2025 carries the Metalbone name into round-head territory, pairing an EVA foam core with a carbon face to produce a surprisingly explosive option for intermediate players. Power at 92 is exceptional for this level, and smashes off the back glass come out fast and heavy. Control at 72 and comfort at 64 are the compromises: expect some arm feedback and be ready to work for placement. PRR score: 89/100.”
“The Nox EA10 Ventus Attack 12K Xtrem 2026 is built for players who want to end points from the back. Power at 89 puts it firmly in the attacking tier, and the frame translates swing speed into ball exit velocity that is difficult to handle at the net. Control at 72 and comfort at 64 are the compromises: both are low, so sloppy contact and arm fatigue are real risks. A specialist frame for offensive players who can carry the technical load. PRR score: 87/100.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool