Adidas Metalbone HRD+ 3.4 vs Wilson Defy Pro V1 SE 2
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ 3.4 wins by 4 points
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ 3.4 scores 89/100 against 85/100 for the Wilson Defy Pro V1 SE 2. Its biggest edge is power (+15). The Wilson Defy Pro V1 SE 2 answers back on control (+11). On price, the Adidas Metalbone HRD+ 3.4 is currently €32 cheaper.
“The Adidas Metalbone HRD+ 3.4 2025 carries the Metalbone name into round-head territory, pairing an EVA foam core with a carbon face to produce a surprisingly explosive option for intermediate players. Power at 92 is exceptional for this level, and smashes off the back glass come out fast and heavy. Control at 72 and comfort at 64 are the compromises: expect some arm feedback and be ready to work for placement. PRR score: 89/100.”
“The Wilson Defy Pro V1 SE 2 is a round-to-teardrop hybrid that attempts to balance offensive punch with playability, but its identity feels somewhat undefined compared to more specialized competitors in its class. The feel is moderately stiff with a firm response on contact, making it best suited for intermediate players transitioning toward aggressive play who want some power without fully sacrificing control. Wilson's padel line still lags behind Tier 1 Spanish brands in materials refinement and court reputation, and at its price point there are sharper options available.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool