Babolat Lamborghini BL.003 White vs Softee Trionic Fiber
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Babolat Lamborghini BL.003 White wins by 17 points
Babolat Lamborghini BL.003 White scores 85/100 against 68/100 for the Softee Trionic Fiber. Its biggest edge is control (+20). On price, the Softee Trionic Fiber is currently €485 cheaper.
“The Lamborghini BL.003 is the diamond-badged sibling of the BL002 and the same paradox applies: a genuinely decent racket, multilayer EVA, Carbon 3K face, 360 g, control 84 over power 82, comfort 74, wrapped in pricing that makes value 38 one of the lowest scores we publish. Played blind, you would call it a composed, control-leaning intermediate frame and suggest a fair mid-range price. With the badge, it costs multiples of that. Nobody buys this by accident, so: the racket is real, the performance is honest, and the premium is entirely for the bull on the throat.”
“The Softee Trionic Fiber is a basic entry-level hybrid that offers adequate forgiveness and manageable swing weight for absolute beginners, but its EVA core feels cheap and underdeveloped compared to rivals at a similar price point. The touch is vague and the power delivery is inconsistent, making it hard to build confidence at net or on drives. Budget-conscious newcomers just picking up a racket might tolerate it short-term, but almost any offering from Head, Bullpadel, or Nox at the same price delivers a meaningfully better experience.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool