Babolat Lamborghini BL.003 White vs Softee Trionic Light
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Babolat Lamborghini BL.003 White wins by 17 points
Babolat Lamborghini BL.003 White scores 85/100 against 68/100 for the Softee Trionic Light. Its biggest edge is control (+19). The Softee Trionic Light answers back on maneuverability (+1).
“The Lamborghini BL.003 is the diamond-badged sibling of the BL002 and the same paradox applies: a genuinely decent racket, multilayer EVA, Carbon 3K face, 360 g, control 84 over power 82, comfort 74, wrapped in pricing that makes value 38 one of the lowest scores we publish. Played blind, you would call it a composed, control-leaning intermediate frame and suggest a fair mid-range price. With the badge, it costs multiples of that. Nobody buys this by accident, so: the racket is real, the performance is honest, and the premium is entirely for the bull on the throat.”
“The Trionic Light is Softee's featherweight offer: a 340 g even-balanced Soft EVA build under a fibreglass face scoring maneuverability 73 with kind terms (comfort 70, tolerance 70) and a gentle 66/65 split. Value 78 is honest. At this weight the brand's usual value-shelf story gains a real distinction: 340 g with documentation is scarce at Softee money, which matters to lighter-framed players and arm-managers more than any badge. The benchmarks still lead on outright arithmetic; the Trionic argues on grams instead, and fairly.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool