Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Bullpadel Xplo Cmf 2026 Martin Di Nenno
Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 wins by 7 points
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 scores 91/100 against 84/100 for the Bullpadel Xplo Cmf 2026 Martin Di Nenno. Its biggest edge is power (+12). The Bullpadel Xplo Cmf 2026 Martin Di Nenno answers back on sweet spot (+15). On price, the Bullpadel Xplo Cmf 2026 Martin Di Nenno is currently €85 cheaper.
“The Technical Viper 3.0 is the bluntest instrument in Babolat's range and makes no apology for it. Head-heavy, diamond, Black EVA behind a Carbon 3K face: swing hard and the ball leaves at 94-power pace, the highest tier we score. Everything else is the price of admission. Control 74 asks you to aim with your feet, comfort 62 makes it one of the harshest hits at tour level, and tolerance 61 turns mishits into nothing balls. Maneuverability 66 means late reactions at the net stay late. For a physically strong, technically clean attacker it is devastating. For anyone else it is a fast route to a sore elbow.”
“The Bullpadel Xplo CMF 2026 Martin Di Nenno is a head-heavy diamond at 365-375 g with a Multilayer EVA core, built for advanced players who want attacking pace with a workable control safety net. Power at 82 produces hard, heavy overhead output, and the head-heavy balance amplifies smash output naturally. Control at 76 and tolerance at 76 give the frame more forgiveness than pure power weapons. Comfort at 76 is solid for a diamond at this weight. PRR score: 84/100.”
Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.
Open compare tool