padelracketreviews
Racket comparison · 2026

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Kombat Arenal 2026 By Manu Martin

Head-to-head on PRR scores, specs, and live prices — independently tested with the same methodology. Updated daily.

Best
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0
Babolat

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0

91
Kombat Arenal 2026 By Manu Martin
Kombat

Kombat Arenal 2026 By Manu Martin

77
PRR verdict

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 wins by 14 points

Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 scores 91/100 against 77/100 for the Kombat Arenal 2026 By Manu Martin. Its biggest edge is power (+16). The Kombat Arenal 2026 By Manu Martin answers back on sweet spot (+5). On price, the Kombat Arenal 2026 By Manu Martin is currently €63 cheaper.

Score breakdown
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0
Kombat Arenal 2026 By Manu Martin
Overall
91/100Best
77/100
Control
74Best
69
Power
94Best
78
Sweet spot
61
66Best
Maneuverability
66
70Best
Comfort
62
67Best
Specs
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0
Kombat Arenal 2026 By Manu Martin
Shape
Diamond
Diamond
Balance
Head-heavy
Weight
365–375 g
350–360 g
Core
Black EVA
Black EVA
Face material
Carbon 3K
Carbon 18K
Level
Advanced
Advanced
Playing style
Power
All-court
Babolat Technical Viper 3.0

The Technical Viper 3.0 is the bluntest instrument in Babolat's range and makes no apology for it. Head-heavy, diamond, Black EVA behind a Carbon 3K face: swing hard and the ball leaves at 94-power pace, the highest tier we score. Everything else is the price of admission. Control 74 asks you to aim with your feet, comfort 62 makes it one of the harshest hits at tour level, and tolerance 61 turns mishits into nothing balls. Maneuverability 66 means late reactions at the net stay late. For a physically strong, technically clean attacker it is devastating. For anyone else it is a fast route to a sore elbow.

223at PadelProShopReview & prices
Kombat Arenal 2026 By Manu Martin

The Kombat Arenal 2026 by Manu Martin is a mid-tier diamond-shaped racket from a Spanish brand with limited global visibility, offering modest power output and a firm feel that demands technical precision from its user. It plays with a stiff, somewhat unforgiving character that will suit intermediate players seeking to develop an attacking game, but the narrow sweet spot and average vibration dampening make it less friendly for longer sessions or off-centre contact. Value is acceptable within its price bracket, though it struggles to distinguish itself in an increasingly competitive mid-range market dominated by more established names.

160at PadelMarketReview & prices

Want a different head-to-head? Compare any rackets in our database side by side.

Open compare tool
More comparisons
Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KNOX AT10 Genius 18K vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Bullpadel Vertex 05 vs Bullpadel Neuron 02Adidas Metalbone HRD+ vs Bullpadel Vertex 05Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs Adidas Metalbone HRD+Babolat Technical Viper 3.0 vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KHead Coello Pro vs NOX AT10 Genius 18KBullpadel Hack 04 vs Bullpadel Vertex 05